The Campaign against New Testament Texts from Qumran.. just a wiff.

It has occurred to me that Rockefeller and the pope are about the last 2 guys any biblical Christian wants involved in the findings at the Qumran caves in 1948, however, those are the two influential figures against whom the Christian is called to be "prepared always" in a war against the truth.  I do suspect that since the scrolls were not found at a monastery of devout Essenes writing the scrolls all day but were actually found near a pottery fabricating site, like archaeologists Magen and Peleg, reveal of the clay found in the cisterns  (not ritual baths) was used for making pottery at a pottery facility, it is a far more likely scenario that the scrolls were hidden in an attempt to save them.  The fact that no one knew about them until they were found, suggests the knowledge of hiding place likely died with the hiders.  If the Jews had the foresight to collect and save the documents, they would have had to know the attack was coming and prepare, which they didn't and subsequently died as the result.  The ones who were able to flee with foresight were those forewarned with Matthew 24, Jesus' warnings to flea the city when you see the city surrounded.  Now those would be Christians.  Christians would have copies of the gospels and the pope has never been very fond of gospels and Rockefeller's name says it all.   So, I suspect that, to whatever extent our Holy and Perfect Lord has permitted the pope destroy the evidence, it has been destroyed... but since God has not let the blasphemous leader remove the Word from mankind's hand, whatever is left will be found when the walls of the Vatican no longer stand to permit ritual rape of children.  It may be the end of days, but I for one will rejoice to read the evidence, even if I am standing right next to Jesus reading it with Him, I just look forward to the day when the TRUTH can reign in print and action and matter of all things in the name of and all glory to God the Father.  In the meantime, these articles, like "bad news for Christianity" infuriate me.

This is in response to the website "Bad News about Christianity", a fountain of Jesuit misinformation spun in true Jesuit form by a humanist zorastrian poodle owner.

The bottom line is that the article is written by James McDonald who knows better... but before I knew that this article was written by someone who knew the difference between Catholicism and Christianity,  I drafted this letter and it treats the then-unknown author, as if they were as blind as I was... IT occurred to me to do some research before sending it (thank the Holy Spirit for that) and I discovered this is part of the plan.  The misinformation in the article is there for the reason I confront below.

the following is my draft in response to the article indicating that the pope likely had info that the Qumran scrolls contained biblical texts from the new testament.

Is it possible that someone did this much work researching and spent this much time learning about the Catholic shenanigans with the bible throughout history as to substantiate a claim with what appear to be well-researched and valid references and citations of material and yet that writer NOT have a single clue that catholicism is the antithetical mirror image of biblical Christianity somehow escaped them? 


It seems such a completely enormous detail to miss, but maybe it's possible.   I'm not writing to insult anyone but to seriously inquire how can the writer be so absolutely clueless that they fail to recognize there is a distinction to be made, the Christianity of the bible is entirely different than catholicism, my excuse up until 3 years ago was that I was catholic.  I had no clue until I actually read the bible by "accidental" (providential) encounter through research but thereafter was horrified by the deception it reveals about that church's lies and am no longer catholic, but Christian, for sure. There is no better analogy I can give you but to suggest the analogy would be if the soviets were to have silently invaded the US and over time slip the word "not" into every sentence of the US constitution as to negate every liberty and their corresponding protection, and slowly convince the people of an Orwellian 1984 liberty was the original. 

On the one hand the article about bad news for Christianity is is so well articulated and the information revealed is so very consistent with what is sadly true about the catholic church that I am thrilled to find this succinct expose of this history since it is rarely seen, but on the other hand, that you do not seem to understand that the pope is motivated (and has been since the beginning of the institution) by protecting his popehood, and that Christianity is his cloak so easily exposed by the texts of the bible, is disheartening.  That church is no more christian than my dog is a cat. 

Actually, as a former catholic who read the bible I can tell you, that church is no closer to being Christian than a wolf is to being a sheep... the costume isn't even a good sheep costume once you read the actual bible and learn what a sheep is, catholics have been defining our image of sheep for so long, though, that at least the catholics have come to believe sheep happen to be  clad in gold and scarlet... but they are not sheep... doesn't the rest of the world know this?  I suggest with the "evangelical & catholics together" movement, it would seem no one knows what the bible says and the pope is greatly benefiting by getting away with his deceptive antics because of it.

I am curious if it is really this common for the well-researched writer these days to be as clueless as I was (until I read the bible and saw for myself) that Catholicism is NOT Christianity or if no one cares?  See the catholic institution may have been rooted in something weird that happened with Constantine, but the day the early church married the roman empire, was the last day the world saw true apostolic Christianity in public for a good 12 centuries.  As it was hunted down and literally extinguished by papal decree between 500- 1600, those days are called the dark ages for a good reason- it was illegal by penalty of death to have the bible in your possession.  Council after council had blended the pagan practices across the empire while Latin was retained to conceal from the common man, just how much the RCC grew in power commensurate to distance from biblical contents until Vatican 1 introduced the approved "missal" of bible verses containing only 1200 verses of the 32,000 the bible has.  What the RCC has to do to those verses to make them fit their dogma is so illogical and out of context that it is no wonder so many lives were lost by the readers when the book was read by regular everyday people... it is not hard to see that the pope is a monster.  The RCC dogma is written to expand the might of the church, not spread the marvelous god news of the Kingdom of God. 

The changes over the last 40 years alone have so far departed from Christianity that Vatican II declared that salvation through Jesus Christ, as outlined in the bible, is not necessary so long as the Catholic Church is involved.  This is clearly seen in the Catholic constitution where it is specified that salvation includes Muslims (see Lumen gentium 16 (126)) who have, as a tenet of declared and professed faith as well as being written on their mosques, the phrase "alla has no son"... Now, if you are the pope that wrote Lumen Gentium extending that hopeful reach out to engender sympathies of muslims, how likely is it that you would want a copy of the letter of John found in Qumron that says:
1John2
"Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also."

That is true Christianity, you don't believe in the Son of God, you aren't saved- you are a liar.  It doesn't just deal with the error of missing the Son in the equation, but it calls that person denying the necessity of the Son, a liar.  God's words are chosen with specificity and the fact that catholicism BLATANTLY rejected them to profess the tenets of Lumen Gentium, demonstrates a motive to embrace power through a dogma of universalism, the very translation of the word "catholic".

Would it surprise you to learn that pope paul vi, the pope who was involved with the dead sea scrolls, was the same pope residing at the church's helm in the late 60s to push Vatican II and this anti-christ dogma as official?  Would it surprise you to learn that 99% of catholics have NO IDEA that salvation has changed and it is part of the dogma they profess? Those people do not know what they believe, they are taught to obey- purpose is driven from their consciousness and hearts by design, the design inherent in Vatican II and underlying whatever happened to any evidence of Christian texts at Qumran .

There is a much bigger picture here, and oddly enough, it is outlined in the bible.  The details are of greatest relevance to the individual concerned about their salvation, an interest not revealed by the author of this article. But regardless of any moral obligation to inform a reader for help with their personal faith, there is a distinction to be made for purposes of accuracy and honest reporting.  It is no simple detail to ignore that this difference exists between biblical Christianity and catholicism, it is a significant detail for an investigator to neglect to share with the audience.

Further, this distinction reveals the culprit by clarifying the motive of the pope's actions and serves to remove the opaque veneer behind which he both takes cover and simultaneously undermines the very institution in which he hides, Christianity. ***this is where I realized it was on purpose**** By lumping catholicism into the the same pile as Christianity, you extend him the shield behind which he has operated for 1500y and you empower HIS attack on the very  bible that exposes him. BiNgO!!

I suspect, there are many fragments of the earliest biblical texts, if not whole books of the bible found at Qumran.  The critical lost element to your article is that the last thing the catholic church wants is a substantiated bible and for its membership to have any reason to read it. 

If Catholics read the bible, there would not be any and I am living proof.  I do not know one person who has read it.  Not one Catholic I know wants to, or even believes me that what I read in the bible is the antithesis of what the pope teaches. It is infuriating that the Catholic mind has been trained in reactionary defense, mindless retort to defend why they can't read it or rely on the bible even though it says what I am trying to point out.  This message that it is unreliable and inconsistent are the lies fostered to keep the pope at the center of faith.  If pope vi learned there were copies of say 'the book of John' in Qumran, I can promise you to whatever extent God has permitted, there is little evidence of anything associated with that info or the trail of it ever getting to him, left on the planet.

This RCC has had a long plan to unravel the doctrine of Christ.  The catholics are clueless and so far removed from the bible that my own family doesn't even believe what I am telling them based on my own reading.... I just happened to read material that Luther and the other reformers saw, and anyone with the slightest regard for truth sees, the pope lies... I don't know a single person who has read the bible so I am not a protestant, it is worthy to consider the distinction.  It is true that it is bad news for Christianity, but not because the pope discovered inconsistencies, but more likely that there were MANY consistencies for the bible- the pope has been trying to remove that book from catholics hands always.... that's why it stayed on the banned book list for the majority of the RCC history. The bad news is for NON CATHOLICS, those who belief the bible and not the pope- we are the ones who are left without our slice of the qumron pie and sadly, it is likely because the pope got a hold of it and destroyed it to keep making a recipe of his own... and worst of all, the Catholics are going to miss out on the salvation of Jesus Christ.